Direct answer
IIBA-AAC focuses on applying agile principles within business analysis work contexts, while PMI-ACP covers a broader set of agile methods and practices across project roles. IIBA-AAC is oriented toward business analysis tasks, and PMI-ACP requires specific agile experience prerequisites and covers diverse agile frameworks.
Core differences in focus
The two certifications emphasize different skill sets and role contexts.
- IIBA-AAC: agile analysis perspective within business analysis frameworks and scenarios PMI-ACP: broad agile principles and multiple methodologies applicability IIBA-AAC aligns with Agile Extension to BABOK Guide PMI-ACP integrates Scrum, Kanban, Lean and other agile approaches
Prerequisites and scope
Prerequisite and experience requirements differ between the two credentials.
Comparison of credential purpose
The following table contrasts key aspects of each certification.
| Aspect | IIBA-AAC | PMI-ACP |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Agile analysis in business contexts | Broad agile principles across methodologies |
| Experience requirement | No strict minimum to sit | Agile project hours and training required |
Common comparison misunderstandings
These points reflect frequent errors in interpreting differences.
- Assuming the scope of one covers all roles equally Mistaking required experience levels as identical Equating scenario emphasis with broader agile practice coverage Overlooking methodology variety within PMI-ACP content
Readiness signals and if/then rules
Use these if/then rules when selecting between certifications.
Summary and implications
Consider role expectations and required experience when choosing between IIBA-AAC and PMI-ACP, and use practice assessments to confirm which credential matches your skill profile.